In June 2022 The Gateway Pundit’s Joe Hoft reported that an Obama choose had sealed the a lot anticipated Halderman Report on election voting machines utilizing in Georgia.
Corrupt Obama Choose Amy Totenberg sealed and lined up the outcomes of an investigation of voting machines in Georgia. This report has nonetheless not been launched. This week CISA launched a report exhibiting materials discrepancies in these programs whereas making an attempt to downplay these materials points.
Corrupt Obama Choose Amy Totenberg s the sister of NPR’s far-left correspondent Nina Totenberg.
We first reported on Obama Choose Totenberg in 2018 when she bought concerned in that election and tried to steal the Georgia governor’s race for Democrat Stacey Abrams.
Choose Totenberg is the corrupt judge who also allowed Hillary’s legal professional Marc Elias to make use of the 14th Modification to try to stop Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene from operating within the 2022 Election:
In 2021, Choose Totenberg dedicated her gravest offense as a choose. She sealed and lined up the outcomes of the Halderman report in Georgia. Up till this week we didn’t know what’s on this report. Halderman’s investigation into the voting machines in Georgia began earlier than the 2020 Election and was accomplished in July 2021.
Steve Bannon interviewed Kurt Olsen, about cybersecurity analyst, J. Alex Halderman, who discovered flaws in Dominion voting machines and warned in regards to the potential for future assaults. Choose Totenberg sealed the report. In response to courtroom paperwork, Halderman wrote his report after he was given 12 weeks of entry to an unused Dominion ICX voting machine. Professor Halderman requested the report back to be unsealed to be shared with the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Safety Company (CISA), a standalone United States federal company chargeable for our infrastructure, together with our voting programs.
Right here is the interview:
The report ultimately made it to the CISA and so they launched an abbreviated report final yr. Many consider that this CISA report was launched in an effort to mitigate the outcomes from the Halderman Report when it’s lastly launched.
The Halderman Report was lastly launched this week. The report confirms that votes could be altered within the Dominion voting machines. The truth is, the report reveals that the Dominion software program could be hacked.
On Thursday VoterGA founder Garland Favorito joined Steve Bannon on The Warfare Room to debate the findings from the explosive report.
Trump-hating Secretary of State Raffensperger hid this info from the general public till now. Why is that?
Garland Favorito introduced the receipts with him on The War Room.
Garland Favorito: Lastly, simply yesterday I consider this report was launched and it has some wonderful findings that principally say what we’ve got been saying all alongside. What Mike (Lindell) has been saying, what you and I’ve been saying, and so many individuals, that the system may be very insecure. It may be hacked.
So what Dr. Halderman did is he checked out solely the poll marking machine a part of the system. This (investigation and report) is proscribed to that. It doesn’t really even embody the scanners which have one other extremely weak. Which we’ve got already discovered have been compromised within the 2020 election in Fulton County. In order that’s the background, Steve, of all of what’s been occurring.
Steve Bannon: I simply wish to make certain. I would like you undergo the slides. Holleman’s completely impartial, proper? He’s some man that’s an knowledgeable within the area. He’s a subject knowledgeable. He has no axe to grind on this, appropriate?
Garland Favorito: Completely. And if something, he leans much more on the Democrat facet than the Republican. However as you mentioned, he’s an impartial professor. Actually has no axe to grind, notably for Donald Trump or any Republicans…
…It was a titanic combat. Folks from throughout totally different organizations have requested that this report be launched for the safety of their very own voting programs. The Secretary of State of Louisiana requested that it’s launched. OAN requested that it might be launched for a part of their lawsuit. I feel Fox Information as effectively, as a result of Dominion is suing them. It’s crucial info, nevertheless it’s crucial to the safety of elections within the nation since you might do Dr. Halderman might have accomplished the identical factor to a special vendor as effectively.
Slide two if Cameron has that already. However principally that is about what we name the Dominion ICX, which is the poll marking machine. And — Dr. Holleman says that… the ICX suffers from crucial vulnerabilities that may be exploited to subvert all of its safety mechanisms. He goes on to say that he demonstrates that these vulnerabilities present a number of routes by which attackers can set up malicious software program on Georgia poll marking units. And he continues on, he says, “I clarify how such malware can alter voters’ votes whereas subverting the entire procedural protections practiced by the state. That’s about as damning as you may get.
You go on to quantity slide three, and he says that attackers can alter the QR codes on the printed ballots to change voter alternatives. The QR code, Steve, as you realize, comprises the votes. The votes are gathered out of the QR code. The system doesn’t accumulate what the voter really can see on textual content. And he additionally discovered that the attackers can forge or manipulate the sensible playing cards that the poll marking machine makes use of to authenticate technicians, ballot works, and voters you’ll be able to manipulate. He goes on to point out how they’re cast. He really cast the playing cards and did all kinds of issues as a part of his evaluation.
So flipping on to the subsequent slide, he says that the software program replace that Georgia put in in October 2020 left Georgia’s poll marking units in a state the place anybody can set up malware with solely temporary bodily entry to the machines. And he goes on to say, I confirmed that this downside can doubtlessly be exploited within the polling place even by nontechnical voters. Go on to the subsequent slide. And he goes on to say, I show that attackers can execute arbitrary code with root supervisory privileges, which implies that. You’ve got management of every thing on the machine.
And he says by altering the election definition file that county employees copy to each BMD earlier than every election, this has been the important thing level of our considerations, is that this election definition file comes from the state, and the state propagates this to each county, which propagates it to each voting machine. And Professor Holland once more says that attackers might exploit this to unfold malware to all poll marking units throughout the county or all the state. And we consider that has really been accomplished as a result of in 2017, we discovered that the Secretary of State’s Election Administration Server, the state server, was uncovered to the Web for nearly anybody on the planet to put malware on it. So head on to the subsequent slide. The ICX comprises quite a few pointless Android purposes.
And he talks a couple of terminal emulator that has a supervisory command interface that overrides the entire entry controls. So he goes on to say that an attacker can alter the poll marking units audit logs just by opening them within the on display screen textual content editor software. So you might actually audit you might audit the audit logs similar to you’ll create or change a Phrase doc. That’s how simple that will be.
Occurring to the subsequent slide. He says that I developed a collection of proof of idea assaults, which he goes over in his 96-page report. And he says that – vulnerabilities within the poll marking machine might be used to alter the non-public votes of particular person Georgia voters, it is vitally possible that there are different equally crucial flaws which can be but to be found…
…He mentioned that attackers solely have to search out one of many flaws. They don’t have to search out all of them. He discovered I don’t know what number of, in all probability a dozen or extra.
Subsequent slide. He goes on to say that the ICX BMDs that’s the Dominion ICX poll marking units aren’t sufficiently secured towards technical compromise to resist vote-altering assaults by unhealthy actors who’re prone to assault future elections in Georgia… Regardless of the addition of a paper path, the malware can nonetheless change particular person votes and most election outcomes with out detection. After which we’ve bought only one or two extra slides.
The following slide: Utilizing weak ICX BMDs for all in-person voters, as Georgia does, drastically magnifies the safety danger in comparison with jurisdictions that simply use handmark paper ballots however present the poll marking units to the voters upon request. So in different phrases, if in case you have a voter with an impairment, they want poll marking machine. However once you give this poll marking machine to each single voter, it will increase the safety danger by an unimaginable order of magnitude. And Dr. Haldeman goes on to say that the crucial vulnerabilities within the ICX point out that it was developed with out adequate consideration to safety throughout design, software program engineering and testing. Actually, I feel that’s true as a result of why would a vendor come out with a QR-coded voting system after we had 15 years of complaints towards the unverifiable voting of the outdated paperless DREs these programs? And it’s not simply Dominion, it’s E&S as effectively. They’ve one. They’re ill-conceived from the purpose that they have been initially designed.
By way of Midnight Rider.