Norah O’Donnell invited Rep. Nancy Mace on Particular Report to debate President Trump’s arraignment for holding “labeled” paperwork whereas negotiating with the FBI on the matter.
After all, Chris Wray’s FBI raided the President’s house and rummaged by means of his spouse’s underwear drawer and his teen son’s room. Now President Trump is going through a potential 400 years in jail whereas Democrats and Republicans who’ve taken labeled paperwork and destroyed proof with hammers are usually not being harassed day by day by the Deep State equipment.
Norah was anticipating Rep. Mace to return on and activate Trump. Boy, was she improper. Nancy Mace placed on a clinic!
Nancy Mace destroyed O’Donnell who couldn’t sustain with the details the Republican consultant was hurling on the CBS viewers.
Nora O’Donnell: Thanks I need to ask you, did you learn by means of the entire 49 web page indictment?
Rep. Nancy Mace: I completely did. I attempt to educate myself on what’s really taking place, however I’ve to be sincere with you, and I’m somebody I’ve had my ups and downs with Donald Trump through the years. That’s been very public. However I simply can’t get past the truth that the precedent for the way we deal with labeled info was first set when the DOJ and the FBI determined to not indict Hillary Clinton, who had a personal server, who had labeled info on that server, who obstructed justice, wasn’t even president, wasn’t even a former president, however was going to be a presidential candidate. And that was the precedent that was.
Nora O’Donnell: Sure. And I needed to nail down on that, as a result of for those who learn the indictment for those who learn the indictment, you discover that it talked about the willful retention of paperwork. And so the excellence that has been made within the case of Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump is the willful retention of paperwork as is laid out, and a query of obstruction that the president repeatedly was advised about his actions and he repeatedly obstructed justice. Do you see any distinction there?
Nancy Mace: Nicely, I’ll say right now once I watch what’s taking place on this nation, the FBI had entry to all these containers in each single room, and the precedent was set underneath Clinton that she wouldn’t be – I feel it’s worthwhile to have a dialog about how we deal with labeled info submit presidency. I feel that may be a worthwhile debate as a result of we need to shield our nation’s secrets and techniques. Okay, I need to get that off the bat. However the precedent was set underneath Clinton. She had a personal server. I can’t consider something extra willful than hiding a server in your toilet, in your house. I can’t consider something extra willful than utilizing hammers by yourself phone, cellphone gadgets, and your iPads to impede justice after which to be let off. And so if that’s the usual, then it ought to apply to everybody, together with Donald Trump.
O’Donnell: However clearly, you don’t suppose that needs to be the usual. That’s the argument that you simply’re attempting to make. So that you consider that Hillary Clinton ought to have been held to a distinct you suppose Hillary Clinton ought to have be held to a better customary. And so then you could additionally agree, due to this fact, that Donald Trump needs to be held to that very same excessive customary.
Nancy Mace: However that’s not the usual, as a result of underneath Hillary Clinton, she was let go. She was not indicted. She had labeled paperwork on her server. They tried to impede it, and she or he was capable of stroll away. So if that’s the usual, then you definately had Mike Pence, who had labeled paperwork in his house. Then you definately had Joe Biden, who had labeled paperwork unfold throughout the nation in several containers, together with unsecured in his storage. If Trump’s going to be indicted, so too then needs to be Joe Biden. I can also’t get past the truth that each time we discover corruption, proof of corruption on Joe Biden, Donald Trump will get indicted. I imply, that’s what I see simply as an on a regular basis American, as somebody who hasn’t seen eye to eye with Donald Trump, and that’s how we’re going to function. I don’t suppose it’s the proper method, and I feel it’s shameful what’s taking place right now.
DISGRACEFUL: @NorahODonnell of @CBSNews broke all of the ethics of journalism throughout her interview with Republican congresswoman @NancyMace in an try to convict @realDonaldTrump on tv, then lower her off and pretended audio was accountable. It is a shame. These are the… pic.twitter.com/ilRC5MwSWM
— Simon Ateba (@simonateba) June 15, 2023